St. Francis Xavier University Policy on Academic Integrity:

Summary for Students, June 2005

 

 

Students attending St. Francis Xavier University are expected to conduct themselves in an ethical manner and to help ensure that no one gains unearned academic advantage over another. 

 

To create an environment in which all may flourish, members of the StFX community share five fundamental values in their pursuit of truth and knowledge: 1) intellectual and personal honesty; 2) mutual trust and the free exchange of ideas; 3) clarity and fairness in interactions with each other; 4) respect for others’ ideas and opinions; 5) personal responsibility and accountability.

 

To address incidents of academic dishonesty, the University has determined upon the following definitions, procedures, and penalties:

 

A. Definitions:

 

1.      Plagiarism: The misrepresentation of another’s ideas, words, or other work as one’s own, plagiarism is a form of theft. Types of plagiarism may include: a) paraphrasing or re-arranging another’s words without proper acknowledgement; and b) using material from the Internet, a database, a book, a journal, or any other source without attribution.

 

2.      Cheating: A more direct form of academic theft, cheating may include: a) buying, selling, or sharing papers or other assignments, or submitting them as one’s own work; b) collaborating on assignments designated as individual; c) submitting to one instructor work completed for another; d) copying or using unauthorized aids during examinations; e) impersonating another or allowing oneself to be impersonated; f) illicitly obtaining, viewing, or sharing information about an assignment or an examination before it is administered.

 

3.      Falsification: This form of academic deceit may include: a) altering research results or transcripts; b) submitting false credentials; c) lying on application forms; d) requesting extensions dishonestly.

 

4.      Tampering: This category of academic dishonesty includes: a) illegitimately using, or illicitly altering, any computer data; b) damaging University materials; c) interfering with others’ work, including their use of computer or other resources.

 

B. Procedures and Penalties:

 

1.      Any member of the University may act as complainant or report another’s academic dishonesty to the course instructor.

 

2.      If an instructor determines that plagiarism has occurred, s/he will consult the Registry of Academic Discipline to see if the student has previously been reported for academic dishonesty.

 

3.      If the student has never before plagiarized, the instructor and student will discuss the matter, and the student will be given an opportunity to acknowledge his or her responsibility, with the following possible penalties to be applied: a) the assignment may be re-submitted for a new grade; b) the assignment grade may be reduced or a grade of zero may be applied. The instructor will report to the Registrar both the problem and its resolution; and the Registrar will add the student’s name to the Registry of Academic Discipline, to be removed upon graduation.

 

4.      Should the student refuse to acknowledge that plagiarism has occurred, or reject the instructor’s determination, s/he may appeal in writing to the Senate Committee on Academic Discipline, with a copy to the instructor, who will prepare a brief for the Committee.

 

5.      In the case of a second determination of plagiarism, or in the case of any other form of academic dishonesty, the complainant (the instructor or other accuser) will prepare a detailed statement on the matter, to include the names of any witnesses, and send it to the Academic Discipline Officer. The Officer will review the statement and decide whether the case should proceed to the Senate Committee on Academic Discipline.

 

6.      The Senate Committee on Academic Discipline will meet within a week of receiving a complaint or an appeal, will review the information, and may interview the complainant(s). Should the student admit culpability, the Committee will determine an appropriate penalty. Should the student dispute his or her guilt, s/he may present arguments to the Committee, accompanied by an advocate or witnesses. Meeting in camera, the Committee will decide the case on the civil standard, which is the balance of probabilities, and based on a majority vote.

 

7.      If the student is found guilty, penalties may range from a grade of zero for the assignment, to a grade of zero for the course, to academic probation for a specified period, to temporary suspension from the University, to permanent dismissal from the University. Penalties for repeat offences will be increasingly severe, and all decisions will be recorded in the Registry of Academic Discipline. In the case of probation, suspension, or dismissal, the penalty will be noted on the student’s transcript for a length of time to be determined by the Committee.

 

8.      Should the student or the complainant wish to appeal the Committee’s decision, s/he may petition the Joint Committee on Studies, which may, based on a majority vote, endorse or amend the decision of the Senate Committee on Academic Discipline. Decisions of the Joint Committee on Studies are final.

 

The complete Policy on Academic Integrity is available at http://www.mystfx.ca/services/registrar/academic-integrity-document.pdf